Atiku releases ‘evidence’ of election result from INEC website.

PDP Presidential applicant in the February 23rd presidential decision, Atiku Abubakar, has demanded the outcome from the server of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) indicates he crushed President Buhari in the presidential race.

Atiku gave this accommodation to the presidential race court and he discharged a "one of a kind MAC address and Microsoft item ID of the INEC server" from where the outcomes were gotten.

INEC had on February 27th, proclaimed that President Buhari surveyed a sum of 15,191,847 votes to overcome Atiku who surveyed an aggregate of 11,262,978 votes.

Anyway in his request submitted at the decision court, Atiku asserted he surveyed an aggregate of 18,356,732 votes to crush Buhari, who, as indicated by what the INEC server demonstrated his group, surveyed 16,741,430 votes.

INEC while responding to Atiku's case, said the assumes that was displayed by the PDP hopeful were produced.

Because of INEC's case, Atiku and the PDP in an announcement discharged today, said the location of the server from which the outcomes were gotten are remarkable to INEC.

"The Servers from which the said figures were inferred have a place with the principal Respondent (INEC). The figures and votes were transmitted to the main Respondent's Presidential Result's Server 1 and from that point collected in INEC_PRES_RSLT_SRV2019, whose Physical Address or novel Mac Address is 94-57-A5-DC-64-B9 with Microsoft Product ID 00252-7000000000-AA535. The above depictions are remarkable to the 15t Respondent's Server," they said.

"There is no guess in the votes and scores in the table argued by the Petitioners. The figures are verifiable. The Spokesperson for the second Respondent's Campaign Organization straightforwardly conceded that the information being referred to was in the primary Respondent's Server when he composed and presented a request to the Inspector General of Police and the Director General of the Department of State Services (DSS) requesting that the Security offices research the second Petitioner thus for supposedly hacking into the Server of the 1St Respondent and acquiring the information being referred to.

"In particular, Mr. Festus Keyamo, SAN, the Spokesperson of the second Respondent guaranteed in the said appeal that it was the principal Petitioner who snuck the information into the Server."

Atiku and the PDP additionally claimed the INEC executive "submitted grave mistakes in the last assemblage work out" for the race by "dishonestly acknowledging" a few people with ideological groups, including "Okotie Christopher, Reverend Dr. Onwubuya and Ojinika Jeff Chinze."

"The grave blunders alluded to in sections 4 and 5 above were under the hands and mark of the primary Respondent's Chairman, (who was likewise the Returning Officer) in the lead of the last examination of the consequences of the Presidential Election," they included.

"The Petitioners express that the last outcomes as proclaimed by the primary respondent are those that were transmitted online to the site of the principal Respondent (www inecnigeria.org)."

Atiku Abubakar of the People’s Democratic Party